Philosophy
Papers
Same
Day Delivery!
Only $9.95/page + FREE Bibliography!!!
|
Papers On More Philosophers & Philosophies
Page 6 of 36
|
|
Philosophy
Papers
Same
Day Delivery!
Only $9.95
/page + FREE Bibliography!!!
|
Papers
On More Philosophers &
Philosophies
Page
6 of 73
|
|
Plato,
Aristotle, and St. Augustine on a Contemporary
Issue: Drug Abuse
[ send
me this paper ]
A ten page paper explaining the philosophies
of these three seminal thinkers in great
detail, and speculating about their opinions
on the issue of drug abuse in our own day. The
paper concludes that Aristotle provided the
best way of looking at the situation from a
broad, organizational level, while a
combination of the Platonic and Augustinian
approaches work best when working with
individuals seeking to change their lives.
Bibliography lists seven sources.
Filename: KBclssic.wps
St.
Augustine's Confessions
[ send
me this paper ]
A 5 page paper which analyzes St. Augustine's
'Confessions.' Also discussed is the relevancy
of his work today as it relates to modern life
and Christianity. Bibliography lists 4
additional sources.
Filename: RAstconfes.wps
Natural
Law
[ send
me this paper ]
This 6 page paper provides an overview of
natural law theory and compares and contrasts
the views of Aquinas, Hobbes and Cicero.
Examples are provided. Bibliography lists 3
sources.
Filename: SA51Nat .wps
Renaissance
History / The Moral Philosophy of the
Humanists
[ send
me this paper ]
A 9 page paper that provides an overview of
the issue of morality and man's human nature
as they relate to the Humanists of Renaissance
Europe. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: Renhum.wps
Dworkin,
Mills And Rawls: Article Summarization
[ send
me this paper ]
5 pages in length. The writer summarizes three
articles: Ronald Dworkin's 'Is affirmative
action doomed?,' Mills' 'Of the limits to the
authority of society over the individual,' and
John Rawls' 'A theory of justice.' No
additional sources cited.
Filename: TLCrawls.wps
If
We Are Social Animals, Then Whose Perspective
Do We Adopt / John Rawls' or Robert Nozick's?
[ send
me this paper ]
A 10 page paper that explores the difference
between the theories of justice espoused by
these two prominent Harvard philosophers,
focusing particularly on concepts of
cooperation for mutually beneficial goals, and
alternative concepts for the just distribution
of the primary benefits of society. The
position is taken that both theories can be
critiqued from the perspective of their
assumptions that human beings operate as
separate individuals who make rational choices
out of a place of self-interest. The question
is whether either social contract or
entitlement theory can fully explain the
reasons why humans cooperate for mutual
well-being. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: Rawnov.wps
John
Rawls' Difference Principle and Original
Position
[ send
me this paper ]
John Rawls has been described as the foremost
political philosopher of the twentieth
century. His philosophy is aligned with Kant
and addresses both the ethical forms of
political systems and economic theories. This
6 page paper addresses Rawls' concepts of
Original Position and Difference Principle in
terms of comparison with Libertarianism,
Marxist principles and programs appropriate to
the United States. Bibliography lists 4
sources.
Filename: KTjrawls.wps
John
Rawls' Original Position
[ send
me this paper ]
This 8 page paper discusses John Rawls theory
of fairness and justice. Specifically, the
essay addresses Rawls' principles concerning
inequality in society, when they are just and
when they are not just. This discussion
inherently must include a description of the
maximin rule and what Rawls called the
original position. Bibliography lists 5
sources. PGrawls.msw
Filename: PGrawls.msw
Request
a FREE, one page excerpt
from ANY paper!
Customized
assistance is also available!
|